*
Scoring Key: 5=Strongly Agree 4=Agree 3=Neutral 2=Disagree 1=Strongly Disagree 0=Not applicable to my practice
54321Not Applicable
Recognize and discuss the emerging presence of hybrid academic community cancer centers – those in traditionally non-academic community settings.
Review similarities and differences of established models which vary according to individual centers’ strengths and needs.
Implement a patient education programming model proven to enhance patient and family engagement and positively impact patient care outcomes.
Identify and recommend new concepts inspired by models and practices of other centers.
Formulate a plan for future and ongoing collaboration in support of further development of hybrid academic community cancer centers.
*
Scoring key: 5=Very effective, 4= Effective, 3= Somewhat effective, 2= Slightly effective, 1= Completely Ineffective, N/A= Not Applicable
54321Not Applicable
Roundtable Discussion I: Who We Are
Roundtable Discussion II: Funding Research at Hybrid Centers
Roundtable III: Relating to Our Academic Partners
Roundtable Discussion IV: Dealing with Culture Clash
Roundtable Discussion V: No Margin, No Mission
Roundtable Discussion VI: Successfully Recruiting and Retaining Staff
Roundtable Discussion VII: Branding and Marketing Your Center within Your Hospital System and in the Community
Roundtable Discussion VIII: Conclusions, Next Steps and Closing Comments
*
*
YesNoNot Applicable
Increased my knowledge
Enhanced my performance
Improved my competence
Ensured that my patients will have improved outcomes
*
*
*
*
*
*
*